When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
Online dating these days is the norm and personally, I think that’s great. What I’m not such a big fan of is the fact that most dating websites out there are a big waste of time. Designed to fool you into giving out your credit card info only to find there are no real users. In today’s Spdate review, I’ll be covering exactly what I found on this site and how much time you should be putting into a site like this.
Dating site reviews have become a large percentage of what I do these days and I actually enjoy it. I put in the time to test these sites thoroughly so that you don’t have to. If I can save even one person from scammers, it’s worth all the effort.
The Top Alternatives To SpDate For Hookups Recommended By Dating Experts
If you’re not having the success you want it’s probably because you’re using the wrong app. This is the biggest mistake most guys make. If you want the top hookup options for regular guys check these out first:
| Site | Our Experience | Our Rating | Free Trial Link |
|---|---|---|---|
Best Hookup Site Right Now | Experience Highlights
| 9.5 | Try AFF For Free |
Great If You're Handsome | Tinder Highlights
| 8 | Try Tinder |
2nd Best For Most Guys | Experience Highlights
| 8 | Try Passion |
Dating sites and apps have become so important over the past few years. With all the social distancing that’s still going on, you just can’t avoid using a few of them if you want to meet other singles. Too few people are hanging out in the usual pickup spots for that to be reliable now!
All of this is designed to give me the complete picture of what the site is like to actually use. Both as a free and a paid user. The more I understand the site, the more helpful this review is, right?
So, I’ll always start out with a free, blank account. No profile photo, only the mandatory parts of my bio filled out, and I just leave it for a day or two. A scam site is going to bombard me with inbox messages straight away so this is a great first test. After that, I’ll populate my bio and add a photo. From this point, I’m setting up a legit profile and seeing how many dates I can set up with real women.
After a week or two of this, it’s time to upgrade to a premium membership to see what changes. Dating sites always have a list of perks you can unlock with a premium membership — are they worth it? That’s what I want to find out.
It’s all good and well to get new features added. But I want to know if they’re actually helpful to the average user. Once this is all said and done, I can give you a proper insight into what it’s like to use that particular dating site. In the case of Spdate, the results were more comical than helpful. Let’s move on to what I found.
Let’s start by looking at a comparison between SPdate and AFF (which you can try for free here). Since AFF is regarded as the best hookup site right now, especially for men, it works as a good baseline to give us some perspective.
It’s the best way we’ve found to quickly show how a new site compares to the best out there.
| Overall Our team rates each site objectively based on many hours of independent research, the features each site offers, and how it compares with other sites. The ratings are the opinion of our editors and their extensive experience. |
4 | 9.5 |
| Quality of Women Our opinion of how attractive the typical woman is that uses this site and how easy they are to connect with compared to other sites. |
3 | 9 |
| Popular How many people are using this site to actually meet people compared to other sites. |
5 | 9 |
| Usability How easy is this site to use and how quickly can an average person begin meeting people compared to other sites. |
4 | 10 |
| Privacy & Safety Does this site take proper precautions to safeguard its members, their identity, and their data. |
7 | 10 |
| Effective Our opinion of how easily an average person will be able to achieve their dating goals with this site compared to other sites. |
3 | 9 |
| Value Will the time and money spent using this site pay off for an average person based on the opinions and experience of our editors. |
3 | 10 |
As you can see, Spdate.com lacked in literally every aspect of a website. Pure garbage from the moment I signed in and it didn’t get any better from there. It doesn’t help that we compared it to AFF, but that’s what you gotta do to give a real perspective.
If there’s one thing that might draw you to this site, it might be the fact that it’s free to use. That’s great and all, but in this case, it’s a matter of “you get what you paid for.” You can explore the site for days on end and chat with hundreds of “women.” But what you’ll soon find is that none of them are real people. They don’t even respond like humans.
The site just bombards you with ads full of NSFW photos that are very likely not from users, as you’ll see in our review of the site’s Terms and Conditions. And if you do deign to have a conversation with any of the women on the site, this is what you’ll get:
We have more examples of this below, and they’re worth checking out if you want a good laugh.
If you want to get familiar with what a bad dating site looks like, I’ve just listed down some of the top red flags. Otherwise though, save yourself the time and go use AFF. They have over 60 million real users (compared to SPdate’s 0) and their reputation is great.
Having used AFF’s free trial and paid option myself, I can personally attest to the user base and just how easy it is to get a date on there. The women are real, they’re responsive and you don’t need to fiddle with a low-quality, ad-infested site just to get a date.
Let’s take a look at the positives and negatives of the site.
Search interest around Together2Night often spikes with questions like is it legit, is it safe, and does it have real users. You can answer most of that in five minutes by running a practical pre-signup audit. Start with the homepage signals. Look for transparent pricing or trial language, an unmistakable link to Terms and Privacy that names an operating company, and a clear contact method. Real platforms usually disclose how they moderate accounts and what verification features exist. If you see vague claims about entertainment-only messaging or language that allows simulated chat activity, expect automation rather than genuine conversations.
Create a bare bones account, but do not upload personal photos yet. Leave the profile blank for a few hours. A flood of flirty messages arriving before you add a photo is a strong indicator of automation. Next, complete your bio, add one face photo you are comfortable sharing, and send two specific openers that reference something in the other profile. Authentic users respond to context. Bots tend to reply instantly with escalations that ignore your question or push external links.
Run a quick location test. Set a small radius around your neighborhood and check whether results change meaningfully when you adjust the distance. Low effort clones often show the same gallery no matter what you enter. Finally, explore the chat environment. Legitimate sites keep ads out of the message pane and do not interrupt with pop-ups that look like verification prompts. If Together2Night keeps conversations clean and surfaces verification cues, it is far more usable than SPdate for real outcomes.
I like to start by reading the terms of a dating site when preparing for a review. In the case of fake dating sites, it’s always amusing to see what they put in there. As though 3,000 words of legal jargon makes their deceptive and misleading conduct any more legal.
As usual with a fake dating site, I found several gems buried among their long-winded ramblings:
Literally the first line of their terms was an immediate red flag. Essentially, they admit to using bots on their site to “… Expand the number of actual activity of the web-site” [sic].
In other words, there are no real users so they reserve the right to pretend there are.
Further down, they also reiterate this fact and even show you how to tell the difference between a fake and a real user. Unfortunately though, they’re all fake so these badges mean nothing.
I love how they phrase it like they’re doing you a favor. That they’re spamming you with bots so you can “continue using Website and chatting with other Users uninterruptedly…” [sic].
I’m not quite sure how chatting to a bot helps me continue finding real dates. That’s what I get for trying to apply logic to this nonsense, I suppose.
Want to see what I mean about these badges being fake? Here’s what happened moments after I added a photo to my profile.
Every single one of the members down the left-hand side has an “OFF” badge. According to the site’s Terms, that means they’re a real user who is offline. All up there were 23 “users” that were marked as “OFF” that sent me exactly the same message.
In all but two cases, they sent it to me along with a nude photo. Almost like they’re fake or something. Crazy, huh?
Dodgy as this site clearly is, they try to keep themselves safe by saying you waive your right to the entire legal system. That “Arbitration is mandatory and is the exclusive remedy for any and all disputes…”.
Imagine if it were that easy to remove someone’s right to the legal system?
Legal jargon is often complex but this section really goes out of its way to be convoluted. What this entire section ultimately says is that by creating an account and submitting photos and video, you allow them to use those materials however they see fit.
They can “… Use, copy, perform, display, reproduce, adapt, modify and distribute…” your material however they like.
A very common thing to find in a fake dating website’s Terms.
The Top Alternatives To SpDate For Hookups Recommended By Dating Experts
If you’re not having the success you want it’s probably because you’re using the wrong app. This is the biggest mistake most guys make. If you want the top hookup options for regular guys check these out first:
| Site | Our Experience | Our Rating | Free Trial Link |
|---|---|---|---|
Best Hookup Site Right Now | Experience Highlights
| 9.5 | Try AFF For Free |
Great If You're Handsome | Tinder Highlights
| 8 | Try Tinder |
2nd Best For Most Guys | Experience Highlights
| 8 | Try Passion |
Once I was done reading their creative writing experiment, I moved on to using the actual website. I can tell you, things didn’t get any better from there. In fact, the first 30 seconds of using Spdate were some of the most frustrating I’ve encountered yet. I was hit with several pop-ups like this one, back to back as soon as I signed in:
Even though they style it to appear as though you can message people from there, it’s a trick. Click literally anywhere on that popup besides the “X” in the corner and you’ll be taken to another fake site.
It was much the same with the second popup that I was lucky enough to be presented with. No matter where you click on that window, you’re taken to another fake site.
I can only assume they get paid for referral traffic because they work hard to fool you into clicking other deceptive links. Another example you can see in the first screenshot above is the “Are you over 18?” question in a chat message. Made to look as though you have to click “Yes” to verify, if you do, you’re taken to a fake dating site. Ugh.
Once I closed the pop-ups, I noticed I immediately had five messages from “women”. My profile had existed for all of about 20 seconds at this point, had no information about me and no photo. If that alone doesn’t scream “fake dating website”, I don’t know what does.
After 24 hours, I’d accumulated 41 conversations in my inbox. Not a single one of them showing any sign they’re a real user.
Since I’m such a stud that women were instantly clambering to talk to me, I figured I’d be gracious. I’d respond and brighten their day with some idle conversation. The results were just as ridiculous as I had anticipated. Check out the engaged conversation I had with my good friend “Mattie” below:
That escalated quickly but can you blame her though? My blank profile is just too hot to handle. Just to make sure the dashing good looks are what she was into, I asked her for specifics:
Maybe reading comprehension isn’t Mattie’s strong suit. I like to communicate openly in all areas of dating so I figured I’d tell her I just didn’t feel heard:
Honestly, I didn’t really feel as though Mattie was being sensitive to my needs so I moved on. It has to be said though, this was an engaging conversation.
Since Mattie and I didn’t connect, I figured I’d try another of my love-struck matches. Alyssa really knew how to turn things up to 11.
I’ll spare you the rest of the conversation but let’s just say, Alyssa wasn’t really listening to me either. Although she did have an impressive collection of nudes she was eager to share.
Things brings me to my next point. . .
A surprise to nobody, it seems the photos being used in their profiles and messages are stolen from elsewhere. A quick reverse image search for a few examples all showed these same pics elsewhere online:
After doing a reverse image search of a photo Alyssa sent me, I saw these results. As it turns out, “Alyssa” is also 18-year-old Russian secretary “Natalia”. Heartbroken — I thought we really shared something special.
Ever the professional, I continued with my search for a real user on this site. Alyssa/Natalia didn’t deserve me anyway.
Another hallmark of a fake dating website is an abundance of ads. Real websites like AFF and eHarmony make their money through repeat membership. Since those sites are real and people actually enjoy them, they keep paying.
Fake sites, on the other hand, don’t have that benefit. If they can fool a member into paying for a month’s subscription, it’s unlikely they can squeeze a second month. Instead, they rely on ad revenue and dodgy schemes.
In the case of Spdate.com, this is what you see in most areas of the site. In this particular screenshot, I scrolled down in a user’s profile and saw this.
That’s four different ads, all pointing to different, equally terrible dating sites. Meanwhile, there are just two sections here that are actually related to the user’s profile.
Interestingly enough, this ad revenue and the referral traffic they send out seems to be their source of income. I can’t seem to find any premium option to sign up for. Even though it mentions refunds and payment options in the Terms, I couldn’t pay them even if I wanted to!
If you search “spdate app,” you’ll likely find the Android version before the site. We installed the SPdate Android app on a clean test device to see whether the app experience fixes the issues you’ll face on a desktop. Short answer: It doesn’t, and in some ways, the risks are higher because mobile permissions can expose more data than a browser session.
During setup, the app nudged for common dating-app permissions such as notifications and media access. Granting broad media or storage access on any dating app can reveal photo metadata or make it easier for the app to read device files. Our recommendation if you insist on testing SPdate’s app: deny photo/library access until you’re certain you want to upload, disable contact syncing, and keep notifications silent and hidden on the lock screen. If you do upload, strip EXIF data from images first.
Performance mirrored the web: rapid, template-like messages, interstitial screens that interrupt the flow, and aggressive prompts to tap elements that feel like chat UI but act like ad gateways. On mobile, these interstitials are easier to mis-tap because of smaller touch targets, which increases the chance you end up on third-party destinations. That’s not just annoying; it’s a safety concern.
Battery and data use also spiked during our session, a sign that the app is preloading assets and ad frameworks in the background. Close the app fully after each session and periodically clear the cache and app data. If you uninstall, go to Android Settings → Apps → SPdate → clear notifications, cache, and data before removing it, then review your browser (if any in-app webviews opened) to clear site data there as well.
Bottom line: the “free” app replicates the same incentive structure as the site — keep you tapping, not meaningfully chatting. If you want a mobile-first option that prioritizes real replies and transparent controls, test a verified alternative instead and keep SPdate off your main device.
Local density is the make-or-break factor for casual dating apps. We ran a simple series of “spdate” location tests to see whether the profiles shown are truly nearby or just a rotating gallery. First, we set a small radius (5–10 km) around a dense urban area and recorded the first two pages of results. Then we expanded the radius to 100+ km and compared how many new profiles appeared and whether the initial set reordered or duplicated with minor changes.
On credible platforms, widening the radius reliably introduces new accounts while preserving the original local set — you should see clear changes in distance labels, last-active timestamps, and a meaningful mix of ages. On SPdate, increasing the radius primarily reshuffled what appeared to be the same handful of profiles with repeated prompts and identical opener lines in our inbox. Distance labels were inconsistent and rarely lined up with the device’s coarse location. That suggests the gallery is not strongly tied to your physical area.
We also ran a time-of-day check. During weekday mornings, genuine local apps show fewer online users and slower reply times; evenings spike activity. SPdate’s reply cadence was flat: instant “typing…” followed by canned escalation regardless of hour. Real humans do not behave this uniformly. Finally, we toggled demographics — age and interests — to see if match quality improved. Changes yielded minimal variation in messages received, another indicator that the “near me” pool isn’t dynamically local.
Why this matters: if you’re trying to turn chats into dates, local accuracy drives success. If an app can’t surface verified people within a short radius, your time-to-meet balloons and your reply rate drops. Use this three-step self-test on any app: 1) narrow radius to 5–10 km and screenshot page one results; 2) expand to 50+ km and confirm at least 60–70 percent new faces; 3) repeat at night and compare replies that reference your opener. SPdate failed this test in our trials.
Even if Together2Night feels more focused than SPdate, you may still want a backup that consistently converts chats into dates. The fastest route is to combine a mainstream, high-density hookup platform with one secondary niche app. The mainstream option supplies scale, active local pools, and proven safety tooling. The niche app adds variety and a different discovery mechanic, so you are visible to a new segment.
Start with a large community that prioritizes real profiles and measurable activity signals such as last active timestamps, read receipts, and visible verification. This dramatically reduces the time you spend filtering noise and increases your reply rate on day one. Use tight geographic filters, age brackets, and intent tags to create a small but relevant daily queue. Keep your opener short, specific, and anchored to the profile. Avoid generic compliments. Ask a simple either-or question that shows you read their bio.
Layer in one secondary option that fits your city size and dating style. If you prefer camera-first icebreakers, choose a video forward chat where you can mask your face until you are comfortable. If you like browsing detailed profiles, choose an app with robust search filters and photo privacy controls. The win condition is not collecting more apps. It is sustaining two steady sources of real human replies in your local area with minimal ad friction and no off-site link pushing.
Track your first week’s metrics across both apps. Time to first reply, number of unique conversations that last more than six exchanges, and number of dates proposed. Keep the one that outperforms and drop the one that stalls. This system outproduces single-site dependency, whether you test Together2Night, SPdate, or any newcomer.
Both SPdate and Flingster market themselves as free-to-use platforms for casual hookups and adult chat. However, our extensive testing reveals a massive difference in what you actually get for your time. The “catch” with SPdate, as this review highlights, is that its free nature is due to it being an ad-infested wasteland of non-responsive bots and fake profiles. With SPdate, you’re not paying with your wallet, but you’re definitely paying with your time and frustration. The entire user experience on SPdate is designed to push you off the site and onto a partner’s high-revenue scam platform, as evidenced by the constant pop-ups and redirects we encountered.
Flingster, on the other hand, operates on a fundamentally different and more honest model. It is primarily a random video chat platform that allows you to connect instantly with strangers worldwide for free. While it certainly struggles with its share of explicit users, random disconnects, and occasional fake accounts—a common issue across all non-moderated, anonymous chat services—it at least delivers on its core promise: instant, human-to-human, live interaction. You get a random chat. It is what it is. The anonymity of the platform, even allowing free users to use AR masks to hide their faces, is a core feature, not a byproduct of deception.
Crucially, Flingster’s premium options are for useful filters (gender, location) and a verified badge, offering genuine enhancements. In contrast, SPdate is all but a clickbait portal designed to redirect you to other sites for a commission. If you are looking for a genuinely free experience where you can immediately interact with real people, Flingster is the clear winner over the purely deceptive environment of SPdate. However, if your goal is an actual local hookup with real potential, Flingster’s random, global nature makes it a poor choice compared to established, location-based dating apps like the ones we recommend in our alternative section. The lesson here is: “free” is only good if the product actually works.
If you landed on Together2Night after being disappointed by SPdate, you are not alone. Both brands market quick, casual connections with a free-to-start pitch. The experience diverges once you try to chat with real people. SPdate is free but shaped by pop ups, redirects, and bot like conversations that rarely convert into real dates. Together2Night is positioned as a simple, location-driven hookup site. The core question for 2025 is whether Together2Night consistently puts you in front of verified, responsive users in your city.
Here is the framework we use when testing Together2Night against SPdate and other hookup platforms. One time to first real reply. Can you get a human response in under fifteen minutes with a complete profile and two thoughtful openers? Two, local density. Do your searches return active profiles within ten to fifteen kilometers, not just generic stock-looking accounts? Three, conversation quality. Are messages context aware, or do they push you toward offsite links or unrelated offers? Four, friction. Are you interrupted by interstitials, overlays, or aggressive upsells that pull you away from the chat flow?
In our experience, a credible hookup app makes it obvious when a profile is verified, exposes last active indicators, and limits intrusive advertising inside chats. If Together2Night shows real-time presence signals, reply streaks, and clear report tools, it outperforms SPdate’s ad-driven environment. If it relies on vague badges, identical canned lines, and frequent redirects, you will see the same outcome as SPdate. For most regular guys, the most reliable path is to pair any niche site with a proven, high density option so you are not dependent on a single funnel.
The user journey often leads people from sites like SPdate to alternatives like Flingster because of the severe shortcomings of the former. A typical SPdate user signs up, is immediately flooded with bot-generated messages (as we detailed earlier), and quickly realizes the site offers zero opportunity for a real connection or conversation. The entire experience on SPdate is designed not to facilitate a date, but to serve intrusive ads and redirect users to other predatory websites. It is, by our measure, a complete waste of time and a masterclass in deception, leaving the user feeling swindled, frustrated, and wary of online dating.
This direct betrayal of trust leads users to Google for a better free hookup or chat site, often landing on competitors like Flingster. What Flingster offers is a different kind of anonymity and instant gratification that SPdate completely fails to deliver. Flingster’s appeal lies in its low barrier to entry (you don’t even need a full profile) and the authentic, though spontaneous, nature of random video chatting. It fills the crucial void of instant, anonymous connection with actual human beings that people initially sought on sites like SPdate. This distinction—real-time human connection versus automated bot spam—is the single greatest driver of the “Flingster search” from a disillusioned SPdate user.
However, a quick switch to Flingster may not solve the underlying problem of finding a quality hookup. While Flingster offers genuine human interaction, the nature of random, global video chat makes filtering for quality, location, or genuine intent extremely difficult. It’s a tool for quick thrills and immediate fun, not efficient dating or local hookups. In fact, the very features that guarantee anonymity (like the lack of detailed profiles and random matching) work against finding a local match. This is why our top recommendations focus on platforms that provide a balance of genuine users and effective tools for finding a date. If you’ve been burned by the sheer fakeness on SPdate, a site with a verified and engaged user base, like AFF, is what you need, not just another random-chat portal.
The primary distinguishing feature of Flingster compared to SPdate is its foundational reliance on live video chat and a unique commitment to user privacy through features like Virtual Masks. While SPdate is primarily a completely fake messaging interface laden with aggressive advertisements and redirects, Flingster is built as an interactive, camera-first platform. This core reliance on video is its main defense against the kind of mass bot and fake profile activity that poisons SPdate; it’s vastly more difficult and costly for a scammer to run a believable, live video feed than it is to send canned text messages based on a stolen profile photo.
Furthermore, the integration of Virtual Masks is a clever feature for users who want to participate in video chat while maintaining a layer of anonymity. These AR filters cover your face, tracking your movements in real-time. This unique tool successfully addresses the initial awkwardness and pressure of instantly showing your face to a random stranger, making the initial moments of a random match feel less intimidating. This focus on immediate, but optionally private, video interaction contrasts sharply with SPdate, where the closest you’ll get to a real person is an obviously stock photo and an absurdly escalating bot conversation designed to drain your patience.
In short, Flingster delivers a true, functional chat experience, even if it is random and global. It prioritizes user interaction over ad revenue. SPdate delivers a masterclass in deception and ad-trapping, offering a static, bot-ridden illusion of a dating site. Users searching for Flingster often specifically value the live video aspect and the anonymity tools—features that are not just absent, but fundamentally non-existent on SPdate’s purely deceptive platform. They seek the spontaneous thrill of a real-time, unfiltered connection, which Flingster, for all its randomness, genuinely provides.
Before investing attention in any “free” hookup site — including SPdate — run this rapid audit to avoid time sinks and ad traps:
Run this checklist once and you’ll recognize patterns fast. SPdate tripped multiple items in our testing — especially the blank-profile, radius, and ad-in-chat checks — which explains why so many users report zero progress despite “free” access. Your goal isn’t to collect more apps; it’s to spend less time per real conversation. When a site fails these basics, move to a platform with visible verification, last-active signals, and clean, in-chat experiences.
More often than not, people will arrive at a review like this one with some questions. Below are the most frequently asked questions we come across to make sure they’re covered too. As always, if you have a question that hasn’t been answered here, leave a comment below and I’ll be happy to answer it!
It is a real site, but many users report generic replies and ad-like friction. We show quick tests to verify profiles and safer alternatives.
Start with a high-density app that shows last active and verification, then add one niche option. Our top pick is AFF for speed and real replies.
Try a blank profile test, send context-based openers, and switch the radius from 5 km to 100 km. Real users change the results and answer your question.
Spdate promotes itself as a free dating and hookup site. In reality, most profiles are fake, and conversations often come from bots rather than real people.
Spdate.com is owned by Digital International Inc. Oddly enough, the terms and conditions of Spdate tries to hide the name of this company.
You can contact Spdate via email at support [ at ] digitalint.com.
Yes, Spdate.com is a real site. However, it’s not an effective dating site. They even admit to using AI to make the site look busy.
Spdate is a real website, but it isn’t considered a legitimate or trustworthy dating platform. Reviews consistently highlight fake accounts, endless ads, and poor user experiences.
Spdate.com doesn’t charge for its services. So at least it’s not a money scam. They do, however, use AI to keep users on the site.
No, we don’t think Spdate is safe. Clicking on one of the hundreds of ads on the site might just lead to a scam, though.
Rather than wasting your time on Spdate.com, take a look at our review of the best hookup apps and websites. You’ll find at least a couple of options in here that work for you, no matter what you’re looking for.
Spdate works like any other dating site. You create an account, you log in, you search for whoever you want to meet. It’s completely free, though, so at least anyone can use it without needing to shell out money.
Yes, Spdate.com has an app on Android.
Spdate is completely free.
If you decide to test Spdate, avoid sharing personal details or payment information. Be careful with links and pop-ups, as they often redirect to other unsafe sites. For better safety, stick to verified dating apps.
Yes. Sending messages on Spdate is free.
To delete your profile, just follow these steps
If you found this review useful check out these other hookup sites:
Tender Meets Review
Amateur Match Review
Meet24 Review
FDating Review
Meet Wild Review